In <[log in to unmask]>, on 09/30/99
at 01:21 PM, Bill Kapelas <[log in to unmask]> said:
>Its been a while but I vaguely recall OS2 won't see more than 64meg of
>RAM. (But its still a better OS)
Not so! I've been using OS/2 with 128MB for the last two years. It works
like a charm under various motherboards. The problem I described came
about only after flashing the BIOS of the Soyo SY-5EMA+. Before the
flashing OS/2 saw all 128MB, after the bios flash OS/2 saw only 64. A
really weird situation I have never before seen. I have resolved the
issue by returning to the earlier bios version I was using before.
However, thanks for the input in any case.
Dave Gray.
P.S. You are however quite right that OS/2 is a better OS than WIN9X :)
PCBUILD mailing list is brought to you by:
The NOSPIN Group
http://nospin.com - http://nospin.org