Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jul 2001 09:24:15 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 23:22:03 -0400, Micki Lewis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
} All I can say is that people are reporting their personal experiences
} substantiated my bone density tests. Double blind studies are currently
} being conducted at various medical centers around the country. BTW, no
} double blind studies were ever conducted as to the efficacy of
} aspirin.
Searching PubMed for "double blind AND aspirin" gives 1675 results.
Searching for "double blind AND acetylsalicylic acid" gives 1472
results. Some of them are relevant. Check http://www.nlm.nih.gov for
more info.
So much for truth in advertisement...
} Since these products are non-invasive and have no adverse side
} effects
If no clinical studies have been made, how would you know that they
"have no adverse side effects"?
} aren't they, at least, worth considering?
In that case, I can sell you a charm against osteoporosis for, say, $99.
No adverse side effects - guaranteed! By your own argument it is at
least worth considering.
} At 10:36 PM 7/21/2001 -0400, you wrote:
} >http://www.hcrc.org/cgi-hcrc/fs.cgi?qkey=3D505
I also wrote:
What peer reviewed scientific publication can substantiate these claims?
Mow, Micki, I have nothing against you or Nikken in particular. I am
suspicious of ALL multilevel-marketing companies that claim to address
health issues with no clinical proof.
Best regards,
Alex.
|
|
|