Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 17 May 1999 02:52:04 +0100 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Why talk of capitalism when we should talk of corporatism?
Vunch wrote:
> In a message dated 3/4/98 10:51:34 PM Eastern Standard Time, [log in to unmask]
> writes:
>
> << In response to an intelligent, and, actually, very RELEVANT point about the
> nature of "capitalism", i.e. a completely artificial construct which exists
> only due to government enforcers (protectionists) ...... we get this ------>
>
> << Yea, Yea, Yea, so the essence of capitalism is quite different from
> currently
> used textbook definitions. Anything new under the sun lately? >>
>
> this list has been has been a such a huge disappointment, a total waste of
> time. >>
>
> Not getting the point, capitalism is much more than government intervention,
> it has become ingrown into the very nature of all human relationships. That
> is why I commented that textbook definitions were wholly inadequate to capture
> the essence of capitalism. It seems that you feel exactly the way capitalism
> expects you to feel, defeated. See ya'.............
|
|
|