In a message dated 1/23/99 10:48:34 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> It is risky because when a parent with a child with severe food allergies
> reads a
>  claim that a method cures food allergies they attempt it falsely think that
> would
>  cure allergies they would take a risk of trying food and thus  risk a
chance
> of a
>  fatal reaction.   Most parents receive no educational information on the
> dangers
>  of food allergies from their allergist.   Then when they start reading they
> are
>  often misinformed and take huge risks.

Yes, I see your point. Even if "cleared" I would still exercise extreme
caution in introducing milk into a kid's diet with an anaphylactic allergy.

However, your previous post--at least to me--implied that NAET itself is
risky.  Being non-invasive by use of acupressure would not pose risk.  Loss of
money, perhaps, if the treatment is not effective.  However, if NAET can even
*reduce* the severity of an anaphylactic child's allergy, then at least for my
kid, I think it would be worth the try.

Lynda