Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Feb 1999 13:30:41 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thank you Jeff, this is useful information. It seems hard to keep up with
the changes in Win9x. For the record, I did use XCOPY32 to make disk images.
To do this, I created a bootable Win95 diskette - no GUI, just DOS 7. Then
XCOPY32 was able to copy all the long file names and directory structures.
This was under Windows 95 original build - no SP. However, based on the
information in the article I referenced, my way of using it was not the
intended method.
|| Peter Shkabara
|| Computer Science Instructor
|| Rogue Community College, Grants Pass, OR
|| [log in to unmask]
|| http://www2.rogue.cc/pshkabara
-----Original Message-----
> At one time I thought I discovered XCOPY32 to perform long filename
copies.
> As it turns out, xcopy32 should never be used by itself. XCOPY will make
use
> of XCOPY32 if the environment supports the extra features that are
possible.
This information is obsolete under Win98. I don't have later versions of
Win95 available, so I can't speak for those versions, but under Win98
there are now three (3) files that make up the "xcopy suite" -
xcopy.exe, xcopy32.exe, and xcopy.mod. If you run a file comparison tool
against the two *.exe files, you'll see that they are now exactly alike.
Jeff Delzer
PCBUILD maintains many useful files for download
on our web site - visit our download page at:
http://nospin.com/pc/files.html
|
|
|