Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 2 Feb 1999 10:03:05 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
In-Reply-To: |
<028c01be4d01$57915180$4b62e4d0@ctx200> |
Organization: |
General Magic |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 31 Jan 99, at 5:05, Bob Chapel wrote:
> Can anyone tell me if UNIX will run on any RISC processor or does it
> require a specific type of a RISC chip? I recall apple using RISC
> processors and wonder if UNIX can be loaded to an apple for this
> reason.
Apple's AUX (A/UX) was a version of Unix for their 68000-family Macs.
It's barely possible that it might run (but not quickly...) on the 68K
emulation in their PPC machines.
> Can anyone direct me to some info re: RISC processors . Given their
> reduced instruction set do they require substantially fewer cycles
> to complete their tasks such that say a 50mhz chip would be the
> equivalent of perhaps a 100mhz INTEL.....stated more
> succinctly....How does one rate the power of a RISC chip relative to
> an INTEL compatible.
Actually, its the other way around. Because a RISC CPU implements
fewer instructions, they have to be only the simplest and most basic.
On average, that means one RISC instruction accomplishes only part of
what a CISC instruction might have. The benefit is that simple
instructions make the CPU, over all, easier to speed up, to more than
compensate for the less-capable instructions.
So in theory, a 300 MHz RISC CPU might perform about like a 200 MHz
CISC CPU -- but aside from economies of scale, only cost as much to
make as a 150 MHz CISC model.
In overclocker terms, the simplified RISC CPU produces less heat as
it operates, allowing it to run at a higher clock frequency.
If CPUs were like flavours of soda pop, CISC would be like "cola" and
RISC like "citrus". But it still matters whether we're talking Coke or
Pepsi, 7-Up or Mountain Dew. Every different family of RISC processors
is still a different processor family, with its own set or registers
and instruction codes. They happen to embody the RISC *design
concept*, but concepts don't execute programs.
To go back to your first question above: There are flavours of Unix
for a lot of different CPUs, some RISC and some not. There is
*probably* at least one version for the particular RISC CPU you have in
mind; there's no such thing as a program binary that "will run on any
RISC processor".
David G
PCBUILD's List Owner's:
Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>
|
|
|