PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Wally Day <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Jul 1999 11:49:21 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
> Don Wiss wrote:
>
> > If you want to discuss alternative grains I
> suggest you subscribe to
> > the celiac mailing list. Discussing these grains
> is off-topic here.
>
> If I offended anyone here by mentioning that I eat
> spelt matzoh once a
> year, then my apologies to the list.
>
> --
> Deanna
>

No apologies necessary. I am fairly new to this list,
but I do have an opinion about this. The "spelt"
thread originally started out as a discussion of a
possible alternative to regular wheat products.
Personally, I don't think that's off-topic. I had
heard of spelt before, but I was not actually sure if
it was wheat or if it fell into the more "liberal"
category of Neo-Paleolithic (my term) grains which
"may" have been consumed when available.

On a related topic, in another list there was mention
of a couple of "sprouted" grain breads - Manna (or
Essene) and Ezekial. I'm curious how others may
perceive these breads in regards to Paleo eating and
if anyone actually knows how much "processing" is
involved in making these "breads". If it is minimal
processing (like pemmican or other primitive
"superfoods"), then these "breads" may be considered
"paleo-kosher", especially in moderation.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2