Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 1999 22:02:18 -0600 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Richard
When you say the machine was a bear to setup, what exactly do you mean? I
have been setting up AMDK6-300 and K6-2 350 machines recently, and have
begun to question my abilities. I have had numerous setup problems, [from
Windows 95 unable to deal with the 350mhz chip to memory conflicts.] These
problems are in part the reason for my question.
Mike Buraczewski
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard T. <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] AMD K6-2 vs Celeron A
>Mike:
> Although I've not dealt with the Celeron 366, I've got to tell you
that
>the AMD K6-3 350 is an awesome, surprising chip.I've got one mounted in an
Asus
>5a super 7 board, with 64 megs of pc 100, ATI rage AGP card, a decent
soundcard
>and an isa modem and I could not be more satisfied, This particular machine
was
>a bear to set up, but now that it's perfect, I'm really pleased with the
>performance. Great for games as well as" normal "stuff. Unless you're
intending
>to Overclock, the super 7 setup gives a lot of bang for your buck.
>We're going to be curious about what you eventually go with!
>Rich Tabas
>Philly.Pa
>
>Mike Buraczewski wrote:
>
>>
>> Given an AMD K6-2 350 Mhz processor and an Intel Celeron(A) 366 Mhz
>> processor (either slot 1 or socket 370) which processor is better and
Why?.
>
> Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
> Digest mode - visit our web site:
> http://nospin.com/pc/pcbuild.html
>
Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
Digest mode - visit our web site:
http://nospin.com/pc/pcbuild.html
|
|
|