VICUG-L Archives

Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List

VICUG-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dan Dunfee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:28:03 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (175 lines)
   The Christian Science Monitor - csmonitor.com

   from the October 25, 2001 edition -
   http://www.csmonitor.com/2001/1025/p11s1-stct.html

   Microsoft on a mission

   The cool features of the new Windows XP system come at a price: your
   freedom online.

   By Tom Regan | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

     So this is the day that Bill Gates, along with many Microsoft fans
       (and stockholders), has been eagerly awaiting. Today, Oct. 25,
      Microsoft officially offers copies of its new operating system,
    Windows XP, Home and Professional Editions, at stores around the US.

   Mr. Gates and company are hoping that the very news that Microsoft is
   offering a new operating system will make millions of people rush out
   to buy a copy - or better yet, buy a whole new XP-ready computer. The
    events of Sept. 11 may dampen those expectations a bit, but it's no
    lie to say that many in the technology business hope that the launch
   of XP will bring new life to an industry that has been trapped in the
                      doldrums for almost a year now.

     Those people aren't going to be very happy with this review of XP.

    More than anything else, XP reminds me of a tourist trap. You arrive
   in a foreign city, and a handsome stranger walks up to you and says he
   will show you around the city. He offers to take you to the very best
                             shops and restau-

   rants. But you soon realize that he is taking you only to places that
     are owned by his relatives or by someone who gives him a kickback.

     You know how mad you get when you realize you're being taken for a
    ride? That's the feeling I got using XP. It's impossible to separate
   the improved features in XP from the fact that Microsoft is trying to
     use its operating system to completely take over the desktop (the
    'most valuable piece of real estate in the 21st century,' as writer
                     Stephen Johnson has described it).

       Microsoft wants to make it as difficult as possible for you to
    exercise your own choice in what programs you want to use and where
                     you get to go when you're online.

   For all of the good things about XP - its increased stability, ease of
   use and cool new features and look - we're recommending that computer
            owners wait a while before making the leap into XP.

   In fact, this might be a good time to explore some of the alternatives
         to Windows, like Linux. You'll find our reasoning for this
                           recommendation below.

   But first, let's take a look at the best things that Windows XP has to
                                   offer.

    The No. 1 improvement is the stability of XP as an operating system.
    Microsoft software has never quite worked the way it should. But XP,
       which replaces all previous Windows versions, and comes in two
      versions (Home or Professional), finally seems to get it right.

     You need to do a lot of crazy stuff before the system goes down or
    gives you that annoying blue screen to tell you of a "fatal error."

     Programs will still crash, but under XP, they won't bring down the
      entire system. And instead of the "fatal error" screen, the new
       message window actually offers you an apology. This is a very
     important improvement - for instance, I have two or three programs
    that regularly give me trouble on Windows98. The system's stability
   means less work lost because of computer crashes. Another nice feature
    is how fast the system boots up (starts). XP allows you to go from a
   cold start to having programs to work with much faster than Windows98
   - no more long waits as little lines roll across the program's launch
                                  window.

     Although I didn't get a chance to check this claim out completely,
   Microsoft says that XP is compatible with 90 percent of the 1,200 most
     popular software programs available. And if a program doesn't run
     under XP, you can use the Compatibility Mode to fix many of these
   problems. Gamers will love XP - the speed at which video games operate
                          is noticeably improved.

    Here's another cool feature - Fast User Switching. Five people in my
   house use the computer - each with different bookmarks and documents.
       XP makes it easier to share one machine among a lot of people.

     And Fast User switching allows you to switch between users without
     having to reboot the machine. It's much like the AOL feature that
     allows you to switch between usernames without actually having to
                         close and then reopen AOL.

                           Now for the dark side.

      Almost everything about XP - from the new Start Menu, to the new
    version of Windows Messenger, to the fact that the new Windows Media
     Player will allow you to create only a Microsoft-format audio file
       called WMA, rather than the popular MP3 file - replicates the
   monopolistic practices Microsoft has been found guilty of. It screams
   that Microsoft has learned little from its recent convictions on eight
                     counts of violating antitrust law.

    The tactics that Microsoft used to knock Netscape's Communicator out
   of its No. 1 position when it wanted to rule the browser world, it now
     appears to be repeating in its battles with AOL Instant Messenger,
             RealNetworks' RealJukebox, and Apple's QuickTime.

   In fact, you'll need to download updates to make all of these popular
    programs work on XP, something that most people will not do - a fact
    that Microsoft is, no doubt, counting on. And listening to Microsoft
    reps deny any sort of pernicious intent is like listening to tobacco
         company executives deny that tobacco has any ill effects.

     There are technical issues as well. XP is a glutton for hard drive
     space and memory. The program takes up 1.5 gigabytes of hard drive
   space. The recommended minimum memory allotment is 64 megabits of RAM.
     But this is very misleading - like those big bags of potato chips
   where the recommended serving size is 15 chips. One friend told me he
   was able to get good results with about 85 megs, but he had turned off
   many of the features. For the full-blown XP, you'll need at least 128
       megs. Walt Mossberg, in his review in the Wall Street Journal,
                            recommends 192 megs.

   Worse, XP is really not compatible with any machine built before 2000.
   To use XP on an older machine, you'd probably have to upgrade most of
   its major components - sound cards, video cards, etc. Now I don't know
   about you, but I count on using my machines for at least three or four
     years. And while computers are cheaper than they've been in years,
    buying a new machine just to take advantage of XP is silly for most
                                  people.

   Then there is the activation requirement. With XP, you have 60 days to
   "activate" the software over the phone or the Internet. Once that copy
    is activated, you can't put it on any other machine in your home or
    office. But if you change your hardware configuration too much - by
   adding a new hard drive, for instance - XP may fail to recognize it as
    the same machine and shut down. Microsoft is exploring the idea of a
    "home license" for consumers with multiple machines, but so far this
                               is just talk.

    Taken in combination, these ethical and technical issues lead me to
    recommend not upgrading to XP right now. First, there is a very good
    chance that the appeals court will force Microsoft to make sweeping
   changes to future versions of XP that will loosen its tyrannical grip
    on its customers while actually improving the product. Second, don't
      go buy a new computer until you actually need one. While it's a
        definite improvement over past Windows systems, XP isn't so
       groundbreaking that you won't be able to get along without it.

      And then again, it just might be time for you to check out some
    alternatives. Linux operating systems continue to improve, and there
    are more programs for consumers, not just businesses. For instance,
    Sun Microsystems has just released a new, much better version of its
     free StarOffice software that offers a Linux version - it's a real
                      alternative to Microsoft Office.

      And don't forget there's always Apple and its Macintosh line of
                                 computers.

   So be patient and look around. You still might end up with Windows XP.
    But let's hope it's an XP significantly different from the one that
                            goes on sale today.
     _________________________________________________________________

   Copyright (c) 2001 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved.


VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask]  In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
 VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html


ATOM RSS1 RSS2