Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 15 Apr 1998 11:34:55 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 15 Apr 98 at 9:13, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> > Is there any chance you have a COM4 port in this machine? Many S3
> > chips include emulation of the IBM 8514/A adapter, and this conflicts
> > with the "industry standard" COM4 address range.
>
> I'm imagining a method to get rid of this inconvenience, which I
> myself have to test: map COM4/IRQ3 into one of the on mobo com ports, and
> your modem or whatever to COM2/IRQ5. Then probably the port addresses are
> not aliased.
> To check:
> -With DEBUG test aliasing on COM4 on modem or card:
> -i2EA. You will probably read 1.
> -i6EA. You will probably read also 1, which shows aliasing.
> -Now do the change above, and repeat:
> -i2EA. You will probably read 1.
> -i6EA. If you get a different reading, aliasing is gone.
>
> I'll appreciate any feedback.
I don't see where 6EA comes into it. Maybe you're talking about
something else.
To quote from one of the many hits when I search the web for "8514
COM4":
> The 8514-compatible mode of the ... video chip uses I/O port
> addresses from 2E0 to 2E8. This will conflict with systems using
> COM4.
This particular quote comes from a Dell technical advisory, but
there are also diagnostics to detect the conflict, products which
avoid it, and FAQ answers that identify it as a cause of strange
behaviour. [These do not, however, always correctly explain the
details of the problem. One I looked at seemed to imply that a
less-featured video driver could fix the problem, and that's simply
not true.]
David G
|
|
|