Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 1998 21:45:29 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, Tresy Kilbourne wrote:
>
> >> Tresy Kilbourne wrote:
> >> "Same tactics"? Did we deliberately target innocent civilians?
> >
>> F. Leon Wilson writes:
>> Yes, the U.S. did know and deliberately target innocent civilians.
> Tresy Kilbourne wrote:
> Then why didn't we attack the other alleged plant where there would be
> more civilian casualties?
F. Leon Wilson writes:
We? . . . You mean the U.S. government.
I was not part if that bombing nor do I approve.
You will have to ask the Pentagon that question. I'll still trying to
find out the truth WHY the U.S. bombed the Khartoum plant.
> Tresy Kilbourne wrote:
> Why the hell didn't we just carpet bomb Khartoum?
F. Leon Wilson writes:
Is that a serious suggest?
> Tresy Kilbourne wrote:
> Even the Observer acknowledges that the strike on Sifa was so
> precise that buildings surrounding it were left standing. If that's
> terror, so is the wrecking ball next door. You're just twisting facts and
> definitions to fit a preordained conclusion. It's not very impressive.
F. Leon Wilson writes:
OK, you cut out most of what I have said.
You need to define "terror."
You are in support of the extremely aggressive and unjustified actions.
There is nothing more I can say. The discussion is becoming ridiculous.
F. Leon
|
|
|