Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 May 1999 16:00:35 +1000 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 14:27 +1000 12/5/1999, Aaron Wieland wrote:
>alexs wrote:
>>
>> Beef, flank, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
>> NDB No: 13065
>> Vitamin C, ascorbic acid: 0.000 mg per 100 grams of edible portion
>>
>The nutrient value cited above probably *was* assumed to be zero. Just
>because the value is listed in the database doesn't mean that it was
>determined by analysis. If you were privy to the complete database, you
>could look at the code for the methodology used, which would probably
>indicate an assumed value.
This is correct. The source field is 7:
~7~^~Assumed zero; not biologically present or insignificant amt.~
...Richard.
|
|
|