PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Sep 1998 07:02:01 -0400
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (21 lines)
On Mon, 28 Sep 1998, Lisa Sporleder wrote:

> > Even without the junk foods, the fact that we can only utilize
> > 35g of protein at a time suggests that we are built for nibbling.
>
> Even that "fact" is up for speculation.  As far as I have heard the
> 30-35g figure was the result of studies where people were fed mostly
> plant sources of protein. Had they used a protein which is more
> easily digested/absorbed, that figure could have been closer to 60g
> or even higher.  Once again, adequate research on humans in the area
> of protein nutrition just doesn't exist, especially when using *meat*
> as the protein source and humans as the animal of study.

I'd be very interested in reading more about this.  Do you have a
source that discusses this protein utilization issue?  I have not
seen anything to indicate that plant proteins are harder to
digest, but that doesn't mean it's not out there.

Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2