PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:50:18 -0400
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (17 lines)
On Tue, 4 Aug 1998, Hans Kylberg wrote:

> At 11:38 1998-08-03 -0400, Todd Moody  wrote:
> >I conjecture that the answer is yes.  That is, they may not be
> >precisely the same proteins, but they are probably just as
> >foreign to the human digestive system, since we cannot eat grass.
>
> Can't we? Dogs eat grass (very little at a time but now and then).
> There are a lot of green plants eaten in small amounts bt h/g's
> so why not grass leaves?

The main reason is that there's not much there that we can
digest, so what is the point of eating them?

Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2