PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ken Stuart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Jun 1999 19:04:36 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 13:40:20 -0400, Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Ken Stuart wrote:
>
>> This meal description looks to me like what some call a " Paleo Zone Diet ".
>>
>> 10 ounces of meat means minimal but adequate protein for women who are in the
>> lower 40-50% of body weight, and who do not more than light levels of exercise
>> (ie no daily hour-long runs, etc.).
>
>The thing that keeps it from being Zonish is that the carb intake
>is considerably below 40%, if Lynnet's calculations are right
>(and they look about right).  It's probably not a ketogenic diet
>either, but it's close.  If she were doing much high-intensity
>exercise, I suspect she would need to increase carbs, at least
>intermittently.
>
>I don't doubt that this program is as effective as the Zone,
>however.

It's simply somewhat less carbs than the Zone, however in the Zone books, the
only disadvantage of eating less carbs than the Zone, but more than a ketogenic
diet would be hunger.

And I find that nothing kills hunger better than a little fat, such as nuts.


--
Cheers,

Ken                         <*>
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2