On Fri, 12 Jun 1998 19:21:51 -0600 Kelly Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
writes:
> Is scratch testing that bad?  Is it worth it?

It depends on the person doing the testing.  Our daughter had some prick
tests done at about 13 months.  They used a grid of plastic things that
held the allergens and scratched the skin.  It was done in two blocks and
she barely fussed.  Quick and done.  However, she reacted to NOTHING!
Except the control for histamine.  This even though we know by
eliminations and challenges that she is allergic to dairy, chocolate, and
corn (at least).  She also seems to be developing nasal allergies which
did not show up (yet).

What our allergist told us was that it was a good thing that she did not
show positives to the foods because that means she probably will not have
any type of serious reactions.  It also gives her the best odds on
"outgrowing" the allergies.  As for the inhaled, they usually don't show
up as early as 1 year, but anything is possible.  They usually develop
between the ages of 1 and 3.

Personally, I think allergy tests are subjective.  I get a delayed and
very mild reaction to molds, but know they cause me great problems.
Allergy testing is only one part of the puzzle and may give some clues.
My personal opinion is to not rely too heavily on them.  If you can
identify things other ways, that's probably more accurate.  Just my
opinion and experience.

Kathy

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]