CHOMSKY Archives

The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky

CHOMSKY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tony Abdo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky
Date:
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:26:24 -0500
Content-Type:
Text/Plain
Parts/Attachments:
Text/Plain (108 lines)
Published on Wednesday, August 2, 2000 in the Manchester Guardian (UK)
Time To See The Truth About Ourselves And Iraq
by Denis J Halliday

Here we are in the middle of the millennium year and we are responsible
for genocide in Iraq. Saddam Hussein certainly gave Bush and Thatcher a
gift when he invaded Kuwait in 1990. He facilitated the opening of the
much-needed respectability of a UN umbrella for a US-led alliance to
destroy Iraq.

Why? Because despite the costly debacle of the war with Iran, Saddam
Hussein remained the only Arab head of state capable of providing Arab
leadership and resistance to neo-colonial US/UK and western domination
of the Middle East, and its oil.

The war was always about controlling oil supplies, and never really
about Kuwait. But Saddam's invasion of Kuwait, in breach of
international law, provided the opportunity for showing American
military muscle, damaged by the Vietnam defeat; for experimentation with
depleted uranium; and for the destruction of Iraq, combined with
impoverishment of the rich Arab world.

All of us that live in the silent democracies are responsible for
sustained genocide in Iraq. Today the prime minister, Tony Blair, is on
the defensive on a range of largely domestic issues. He does not appear
to be on the defensive over genocide. His unending endorsement of the
Clinton/Albright programme for killing the children of Iraq is seldom
mentioned.
Have decision-makers learned nothing from the Pinochet humiliation? Or
do they still feel immune under international law for crimes against
humanity?

What does that say about us all? Does it say that, after 10 long
decimating years of the UN economic embargo on the people of Iraq, we
simply do not care? We do not care when Unicef reports that 5,000
children under five years old die each month unnecessarily from
embargo-related deprivation. And Unicef does not count the teenagers,
the adults and the aged that die.

Do we not care that the UN allies, in breach of Geneva conventions,
destroyed the lives of civilians through direct bombing and destruction
of electric power capabilities, clean water systems, sanitation and
health care?

Do we not care that Iraqi society, culture and learning, rooted in the
cities of Mesopotamia, is dying alongside its people? Are we really that
racist? Are we really that anti-Islamic? Could Britain stand by and
watch the same holocaust within a white Christian state?

What can be done? Why not set aside US propaganda and demonisation and
do a Nixon to China, or a Clinton-Putin outreach to Pyongyang - ie,
communicate. Begin to understand what is happening in Iraq, and begin
perhaps to influence change and better relations within the Middle East.

Why not address the concerns of the Kuwaiti and Saudi leadership, who
fear a resurgence of Iraqi regional ambition, by encouraging their
political collaboration with Baghdad? At the same time ease fears
through control of purchasing by, and sales to, Iraq of offensive
weapons of mass or other forms of destruction.

Demand the removal of weapons of mass destruction from the region,
including Israel, as in the US-drafted paragraph 14 of UN Resolution
687.

Critically, end the economic embargo and allow the Iraqi economy to
resurface. End malnutrition and high child mortality rates. Get people
back to work. Re-establish the dinar and its purchasing power. Repair
the power, water and urban sewage systems. Rebuild agricultural
production, health care and education.

End the killing now. Remove any excuse that Baghdad has today for the
ongoing catastrophe. End human rights abuses by the UN via the embargo.
Demand an end to civil and political rights abuses by Baghdad.

Acknowledge we have reduced the Iraqis to refugees in their own country,
being fed inadequately despite use of their own oil revenues.

Let us not be blinded by wasteful expenditures on palaces or luxury
cars. Should we expect a higher standard in Iraq when the UK spends
millions of pounds on a dome while British people are homeless and
hungry?

Let us be honest. We do not care for democracy in the Middle East as
much too threatening to that oil cow Saudi Arabia and its offspring
Kuwait. Admit the US/UK governments want country stability so that they
can invest profitably and be sure of oil but regional instability so
that demand for arms manufacturing and sales is sustained.

Let us invest in people and peaceful coexistence in the world, including
the Middle East. Let's rally around the world as the one small
threatened unit it is today, just as the Iraqis have rallied around
Saddam Hussein under western attack.

Let us recognise the calamity of the US/UK- driven UN economic embargo
on Iraq. Calamitous not only for Iraq and its people, but for us all,
including the very survival of the UN itself as a credible instrument
for peace and security.

Let us take some risks. Let us even remain ultimately self-serving and
yet visionary - by responding to such global crises as Africa, global
poverty, HIV-Aids, the environment, globalisation ills - the things that
really matter, while allowing the children of Iraq to live.

Denis J Halliday, a visiting professor at Swarthmore college in
Pennsylvania, is a former UN assistant secretary general and UN
humanitarian coordinator in Iraq 1997-98
© Guardian Newspapers Limited 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2