Thanks for responding
MichaelP

===============
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Shyamal Gupta wrote:

> At 07:03 AM 06/22/2000, MichaelP wrote:
>
> >Would you care to elaborate on WHY you believe the WHO report is in any
> >way controversial?
>
> Michael, I wasn't referring to *my* belief that the report is controversial
> -- the news report describes it as controversial. The news report also
> clarifies why they take it as "controversial".
>
> [Having said that I must admit that having gone through this news article
> once again (after this question of yours) I can well believe it *is* a
> controversial report. For instance, the hesitation (and consequent delay)
> in publishing this report seems to indicate an anticipation of controversy.
> If the news report is to be believed, the pressures *not* to publish the
> report are equally indicative.]
>
> This poor chap, the chief of the WHO, may be in deep trouble now ! :)
>