Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jan 1999 05:58:42 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-cc: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<008001be395f$0c179120$12b09ea9@safora> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 05:26 1/6/99 -0500, Roberto Safora Romay wrote:
>Is there any way that I can recognize the K6s belonging to that batch?
>Were they dealed?
Do you mean were they sold to people? You bet! I have one.
But the problem only surfaces under unusual circumstances.
For more information, there is a website devoted to the bug:
<http://www.multimania.com/poulot/k6bug.html>.
The K6-200 CPUs that were affected were Stepping A and some of stepping B.
Processors that were made after week 30 of 1997 should be okay. That is,
processors with serial numbers like "B 9731FPAW" which I believe indicates
stepping B and week 31 of 1997. Many week 30 K6s _may_ be okay as well.
Here's a message from AMD tech support on this:
>Hello,
>
>AMD recently received reports from a limited number of users having
>intermittent problems while running core re-compiles of the Linux
>shareware operating system. Our systems engineering group has duplicated
>the observation and determined that it is related to a previously know
>erratum. Full technical details of this erratum are documented in
>section 2.6.2 of the AMD-K6 MMX Enhanced Processor Revision Guide posted
>on our website, www.amd.com. Users that feel they are being affected by
>this problem, should contact AMD s support line at (408) 749-3060 and
>ask for Dan Hingle or Glen Garcia.
>
>Regards,
>
>Technical Support
The errata referred to is <http//www.amd.com/K6/k6docs/revgd.html>.
Regards,
Bill
The PCBUILD web site always needs good submissions. If
you would like to contribute to the website, send any
hardware tech tips or hardware reviews to:
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|