PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Aug 1998 23:14:44 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (22 lines)
On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, James Crocker wrote:

> Although delaying fertility sounds bad there is no reason why it would
> be.  Female mammals on CR diets can't reproduce.  But if the calorie
> intake in icreased later on, they can.  This can occur not only long
> after normal menopause in the control groups, but after the last animal
> in the control group dies from old age!

Delayed fertility may be an indirect bit of evidence in support
of your theory that true paleo was CR.  I have read that the
population explosion began with the advent of agriculture, and
the earlier onset of fertility could well be a contributing
cause.

Perhaps CR causes something like neoteny, or the extended
duration of immaturity.  Thinking of it another way, perhaps what
we are calling CR is "natural" and "caloric overload" is the
cause of the opposite of neoteny: "premature maturity."

Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2