Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 2 May 1998 23:20:36 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
While not ideal, it will work. I have had to run Cat. 5 100 Mb.
Ethernet connections in similar locations, even having to fasten the
cat. 5 onto the power cables with ty-wraps. After installing the run
I do a 24 hour impulse noise measurement on the cable plus the usual
Cat. 5 certifications. Have not had a problem yet, even when
upgrading the network to ATM speeds.
> I am building a peer to peer network at work and up to this point have been
> using Cat 5 UTP cable. I need to tie in another user on the floor above our
> main office which involves running a cable about 130ft. My choice of cable
> routes is pretty limited because of the way the building is constructed and
> the location of this office. The route I am planning to follow involves
> running the network cable in a boxed in enclosure housing 5 electrical
> conduits carrying 120v household circuits. After about 40ft of this I will
> be able to follow another route away from conduit. If I use Cat 5 UTP can I
> expect to experience signal problems on this leg of the network as a
> result of close proximity to the electrical conduits? Should I be using STP
> cable? If so, is it possible to use RJ45 connectors as this is all my hub
> has. I read somewhere that when using shielded cable you needed to use IBM
> connectors(whatever they are) which would terminate at both ends otherwise
> shielding would have no effect?????? Would appreciate any advice based on
> your experience.
>
Dale Laluk / [log in to unmask]
P.O. Box 308
Hudson's Hope, B.C. V0C 1V0
250-783-9921
|
|
|