>X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
>Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 11:05:35 -0500
>To: Preservation-List <[log in to unmask]>
>From: Anthony Yen <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: Fwd: List Problems
>Cc: ARWNY <[log in to unmask]>, DBCoe <[log in to unmask]>,
>        John Leeke <[log in to unmask]>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Sender: [log in to unmask]
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
>
>At 03:33 PM 12/22/97 -0500, Ken Follet wrote:
>>From: DBCoe <[log in to unmask]>
>>Return-path: <[log in to unmask]>
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: List Problems
>>Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 10:37:31 EST
>>Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com)
>>
>>Did the Preservation-L manager get a note from AOL?
>
>Nope.  It makes sense though; if you were about to block spammers, you
>would hardly ask that population to say in effect whether they were
>spamming or not.  About the only way to set up an effective block is to put
>it in place and sort things out later.
>
>I do have a permament solution on the near horizon, however.  My real job
>is a computer consultant, and for a while now I have needed to set up my
>own server at home to serve my consulting practice while I am on the road
>(which is constantly these days).  Once that server is set up, the list
>will have a new, permament home that won't make it to any spam list.  I
>expect to purchase all the necessary equipment in February, and have the
>list moved by the end of March next year (I only get some weekends at home
>these days).
>
>In the meantime, please hang in there folks.
>
>Anthony
>

____________________________________________
Dan Becker
Executive Director, Raleigh Historic Districts Commission

[log in to unmask]