BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS The historic preservation free range." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri, 9 Jan 1998 07:20:46 EST
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Organization:
AOL (http://www.aol.com)
Reply-To:
"BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS The historic preservation free range." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
In a message dated 1/9/98 1:21:50 AM EST, [log in to unmask] writes:

> All federally permitted or funded projects which
>  have effects on historic structures would follow the Secretary of
Interior's
>  Standards and Guidelines in negotiating the treatment of specific
>  properties affected by the undertaking.

Although one would hope that the Standards and NHPA would protect historic
properties affected by federal undertakings, all too often the result is "D&D
preservation" -- document and destroy.  Memorandums of agreement, in my
experience, are notoriously uncreative when it comes to mitigation and
sensitive treatment of historic resources.

Mary Krugman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2