Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 1 Apr 1998 20:23:19 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Wed, 1 Apr 1998, Betty Guyer wrote:
> Hi Todd,
>
> I have never heard that there was any controversy about HDL being good.
> My HDL is higher then my LDL. HDL ...99 LDL...89. Should I be
> concerned?
>
> Betty
> -----------------------------------------
> <Of course, there is still controversy about whether HDL
> cholesterol is in fact "good".>
The controversy is about whether cholesterol in general, HDL or
LDL, has significant health implications, good or bad.
The following web site deserves to be read very carefully:
http://home2.swipnet.se/~w-25775/index.htm
For once, the author is not just an Internet soothsayer (like
myself) but an actual researcher in the field. Anyway, I didn't
mean to imply that HDL might be *bad*, only that it might not be
particularly good either, in which case it would not explain the
protective effect of alcohol.
Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|