On Wed, 6 May 1998, ARWNY wrote:
> Though there is consideration of signal:noise ratio, what
> appears to be one persons noise is another persons signal.
I like that. If I were still doing quotes in my signature line, I would
do as follows (adding some gratuitous punctuation):
---
Lawrence Kestenbaum, [log in to unmask]
"One person's noise is another person's signal." -Ken Follett