Bravo!!!! Not only do a lot of us choose Windows, but for some, it is
necessary.  My office uses Windows NT, and I either learn the software or
look for another job.  At 06:19 PM 10/6/97 -0400, you wrote:
>Dan:
>I stand corrected, and, of course, you are right about flint arrowheads.
>Certainly there were graphical and intuitive interface systems before
>windows.  I also agree that such still exist.  There's one problem;
>software is not readily available for them.  This is not simply a surrender
>to fashion as you suggest.  Were it so, software would still be available
>for those immune to the call of such a trend.  The unfortunate thing is
>that it is almost inmpossible for us to find DOS based software.  Anything
>worth having is written for this operating system and we, blinks, had
>darned well better get jused to it.  We constantly complain about being
>"left behind" in the computer revolution.  We constantly carp at developers
>who will not design their systems to meet our needs.  I ask you, with all
>due respect, what right many of us have to complain when we lack the
>initiative or confidence to use the operating platform in which that
>software was designed?  That, Dan's my real point.  I sometimes think this
>feeling of behindedness is, at least partially our own fault for an almost
>ostrich like ability to hide our head in the sand to avoid the flood.
>Well, the purpose of my post was simply to argue that there is another
>solution--we can swim.
>Don
>
>IF EVERYONE LIT JUST ONE LITTLE CANDLE,
>WHAT A BRIGHT WORLD IT WOULD BE.
>
>
>