VICUG-L Archives

Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List

VICUG-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
FERNANDO BOTELHO <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
VICUG-L: Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List
Date:
Mon, 1 Feb 1999 15:22:15 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (134 lines)
I apologize for being ambiguous.

What I meant is that the keyboard was not user-friendly.  The keys were
not positioned in an intuitive fassion, and the software  was also very
counter-intuitive.

I wish they had more of a common sense approach rather than an engineer's
approach.

Fernando H. F. Botelho
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Personal e-mail: [log in to unmask]


On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Elizabeth Aldworth wrote:

> Please be explicit about "poorly designed".  I am not agreeing or
> disagreeing by the way since I have never used the product myself.  Just
> wondering what specifically you dislike about the design of this product.
>
> Elizabeth Aldworth
>
> At 04:57 PM 1/29/99 , you wrote:
> >I have used both the type and speak and the teletype, and I must say that
> >the teletype is the most poorly designed product I have seen in a long
> >time.
>
> >Fernando H. F. Botelho
> >Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> >Personal e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Jamal Mazrui wrote:
> >
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 13:37:29 -0500
> >> From: David Poehlman <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Reply-To: "* WEB http://www.rit.edu/~easi" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> >> Subject: Re: Type N Speak
> >>
> >> when it was first developed, it was the least expensive, simplest and
> >> lightest alternative out there.  that is no longer the case with the
> >> advent of the artic product line.
> >> In my use and support of the tns, I have found it to be invaluable for
> >> lite work such as taking notes, keeping track of contacts and schedules,
> >> but for serious work like telecommunications or heavy word processing,
> >> there are disadvantages such as the lack of a built in online storage
> >> system such as a floppy drive or memory card system.  It's memory is
> >> limited and since it is not dos based, even programs that might fit into
> >> it cannot be used.
> >>
> >> I like the idea that products like this don't have a monitor making them
> >> less expensive than they other wise would be and lighter but it can
> >> hamper the low vision user so it would be nice if there was an easy way
> >> to attach one when or if necessary.
> >> So, as a "pocket" junior secretary, it is a nice device but could be
> >> enhanced with the addition of a numeric key pad, a finished keyboard, a
> >> new operating system, and of course some way of not having to cary
> >> around or attach it to a disk drive for data storage.  I shouldn't have
> >> to have a computer to make it an effective tool.
> >>
> >>
> >> The innovations developed into the product over its life span have made
> >> it more powerful and robust while keeping it simple and straight forward
> >> to use.
> >>
> >>
> >> "Sorensen, Gregg E" wrote:
> >> >
> >> > TO: Type 'n Speak Users, and their teachers, parents, employers,
> >> > counselors
> >> >
> >> >      I am interested in hearing from the above parties regarding
> >> > their satisfaction with Type 'n Speak.  Does it meet the needs
> >> > for which they purchased it?  Would they purchase it again?
> >> > Comparing it to a laptop equipped either with internal speech
> >> > (PCMCIA card or other?) or external speech, does it offer
> >> > adequate advantages (cost, other?)
> >> >
> >> >      This inquiry is limited to those having direct experience
> >> > with Type 'n Speak, or working closely with a user of Type 'n Speak
> >> >
> >> > Thanks, Gregg Sorensen
> >> > [log in to unmask]
> >>
> >> --
> >> Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
> >> Touching The Internet
> >> ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman
> >> http://poehlman.clark.net
> >> email: [log in to unmask]
> >> voice 301-949-7599
> >> Dynamic Solutions Inc.
> >> Best of Service for your small business network needs
> >> http://www.dnsolutions.com
> >>
> >>
> >> VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
> >> To join or leave the list, send a message to
> >> [log in to unmask]  In the body of the message, simply type
> >> "subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
> >>  VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
> >> http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
> >To join or leave the list, send a message to
> >[log in to unmask]  In the body of the message, simply type
> >"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
> > VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
> >http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html
>
>
> VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
> To join or leave the list, send a message to
> [log in to unmask]  In the body of the message, simply type
> "subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
>  VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
> http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html
>
>


VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask]  In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
 VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html


ATOM RSS1 RSS2