I am not disagreeing with you, however in your first response, quoted
here at the bottom, you said "we" which I take to included me, and I was
merely stating my state of mind on the subject.  But I must admit your
11:28 am response otherwise confuses me in the context of the prior
messages, but you need not explain.
Marc

On 4/1/98 11:28 AM, John C. Pavao said:

>Food combining?  I'm not sure I understand what you're getting at here.
> I'm not arguing that everyone start eating blubber and fish and nothing
>else.  Can you explain what it is about what I said that you're disagreeing
>with?

In reference to my saying:
>Thus you state your predisposition, however mine is to show that damaged
>tissue and function can be reversed and prevented, to learn what balance
>of food combining will produce my highest level of well being, and to
>emulate that diet for that period of time I prefer to function at that
>peak.

Stated as a reply to John C. Pavao On 4/1/98 at 9:49 AM which said:

>I don't think anyone is suggesting that we emulate that diet for our whole
>lives.  It is usually referenced to show that 1) the human body is not
>nearly as dependent upon carbohydrate-based foods as we are commercially
>led to believe, and 2) it, or something similar, can be safely used as a
>weight loss diet.