PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Andrew S. Bonci, BA, DC, DAAPM" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 May 1997 14:29:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
Karl Mac Mc Kinnon wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 May 1997, Todd Moody wrote:
>
> > I sent this short reply and thought others might be interested.
> >         Animal fat is not the nutrition equivalent of fats
> >         derived from plants.  Audette's arguments that humans are
> >         innately meat eaters is contradicted by human dentition
> >         and the human digestive system, which are not those of
> >         carnivores.
> >
> > I'm not sure what "innately" means in this context.  Audetted
> > does not rely only on arguments from physiology but also on
> > evidence from paleoanthropology as to what paleolithic people did
> > in fact eat.  And he does not claim that humans were or are
> > exclusively carnivorous, but only that we have been omnivorous
> > for a long time, deriving a substantial portion of our food from
> > animal sources.  If you know of evidence that contradicts that,
> > I'd like to know about it.
>
>         All right, something the historian can answer.  If you look at
> the teeth in the skull of a pre-agrocultural human you will find teeth
> that are adapted to eat the five things that are listed as "do eats" in
> NeanderThin: meat, vegatables, fruits, nuts and berries.  When you look
> at humans who have used technology to eat grain, you find two problems
> with their dentation.  One is cracks from eating uncooked grain, which is
> much to hard for humans to chew.  (Try unpoper pocorn as an experement).
> The other is pits from bacteria which love to feast on the residue of
> mashed and heated grains.  The result in both cases is the same, a
> lifetime of constant pain.

Hmmmm,
I'm curious about ant discussion of diet based on tooth morphology.  I'm
an instructor at a chiropractic college and I'm frequently accosted by
students who disagree with paloediets that the true diet of humans is a
meatless, vegan diet.  These arguments are predicated on tooth
morphology.  To date, my best reply is, "Then explain the presence of my
rather large gall bladder."  My gut and particularly my large gall
bladder must be present to handle an expectedly large parcel of fat and
grease at any given time.

Any thoughts on the tooth versus gall bladder problem?
--
Andrew S. Bonci, BA, DC, DAAPM
Assistant Professor, Department of Diagnosis
Cleveland Chiropractic College
6401 Rockhill Road
Kansas City, Missouri   64131
(816) 333-7436 ex39

ATOM RSS1 RSS2