Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - CHOMSKY Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

CHOMSKY Archives

The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky

CHOMSKY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
CHOMSKY Home CHOMSKY Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Prostituion
From:
Harry Veeder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky
Date:
Mon, 7 Jul 1997 15:13:48 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (46 lines)
The meaning of prostitute.

Pocket Oxford says,

"-noun. 1 woman who engages in sexual activity for payment.2(usu. male
prostitute) man or boy who engages in sexual activity, esp. with
homosexual men, for payment."

"-verb. (-ting) 1 make a prostitute of (especially oneself). 2 misuse or
offer (one's talents, skills, name, etc.) for money etc."

Webster's says,

"1. to sell the services of (oneself or another) for purposes of sexual
intercourse. 2 to sell (oneself, one's integrity, etc.) for unworthy
purposes.  adj. debased; corrupt. n. 1. a woman who engages in
promiscuous sexual intercourse for pay. 2. a writer, artist, etc. who
sells his services for unworthy purposes."



On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Tresy Kilbourne wrote:

> >does prostitution encourage the altruism in
> >human nature? I think not, but it is a perfectly valid example of work for
> >wages, when you do any job simply because it is remunerated, rather than
> >because it is worth doing you are no different than a prostitute.
>
> I have certainly felt like a prostitute at some jobs I've had, Bill, but
> that had to do with the nature of the work, rather than the motives for
> doing it.  But you socialists really need to get your party line
> straightened out. I was over at another "progressive" discussion group
> yesterday where a person was censured for using "prostitute"
> perjoratively, as you just did. He was lectured that "prostitution" is a
> fine, upstanding line of work that only capitalists look down upon.

I suspect "prostitution" was meant to refer to work in the sex trade, not to
whether an individual sex trade worker *felt* like a prostitute, ie. felt
abused and degraded by the *conditions* of employment. It is consistent for
a person to endorse the sex trade or any business, but also condemn
"prostitution" ie. the socio-economic conditions of a society which draw
people into a particular trade and then puts extreme pressure on them to
remain in the same trade when they would rather leave.

Harry Veeder

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV