Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 20 Mar 1997 23:21:42 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"Seph A. Reese" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I like, prefer the Rice Dream to soy milk also.
>Anyways, I'm gluten intolerant also
If you are gluten intolerant you should be aware that Rice Dream has a very
small amount of gluten in it. They use barley enzymes to break down the
rice starch to sugar. It cannot be fully washed out.
>Eileen Yoder, Ph.D, President of the Inter'l Food Allergy Association in
>Oak park, Illinois heard about it and after 6 mos of study concluded "For
>most wheat-sensitive people, Kamut can be an excellent substitute for common
>wheat."
Marketing bullshit. Kamut has gluten. There is absolutely no question about
this. It's like asking the cigarette companies if cigarettes cause any
health problems.
Anyway, to get a second opinion on the allergy aspects I sent Seph's
article to the leading US expert on wheat proteins. He replied:
From: "Donald D. Kasarda" <[log in to unmask]>
Sounds like 99 and 44/100 percent pure crap to me too. If the Eileen Yoder
mentioned has published her findings in a reputable journal (I am not aware
of any publication), I would be pleased to evaluate them. Otherwise, I
suspect this is just a lot of pseudoscientific hype.
Don.
|
|
|