Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 28 May 1996 00:44:55 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
<<Disclaimer: Verify this information before applying it to your situation.>>
>All the organizations say no to spelt and I did too for seven years. Then
>another celiac told me he had tried spelt on the recommendation of his
>health food store mentor and found it to be wonderful. So I tried it with
>great trepidation and found it okay FOR ME. Please note that I am not
>recommending spelt for you. So far as I know spelt has never been tested
>for alpha gliadin.
I have to jump in and make a comment based upon this abstract available
from [log in to unmask] by sending the command
GET CELIAC GRAINS CELIAC
As you say, there will always be skeptics. Spelt appears to differ
from ordinary bread wheat mainly in a gene that makes the outer coat
adherent (more like oats) rather than free-threshing. Some people
seem to think this means Spelt is a more primitive wheat than bread
wheat, but it could even be the other way around. On analysis by
gel electrophoresis, the proteins appear to be almost identical to
those of certain bread wheat varieties and as far as gluten proteins
are concerned, the known-to-be-toxic (in celiac disease) alpha
gliadin type has been found both by protein analysis and by DNA
analysis in Spelt.
----
Michael Jones ([log in to unmask]) Orlando, FL USA
|
|
|