CELIAC Archives

Celiac/Coeliac Wheat/Gluten-Free List

CELIAC@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Elkus <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 31 Mar 1995 03:38:45 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
<<Disclaimer:  Verify this information before applying it to your situation.>>

Norman Dewar <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>This may seem a trivial question but why is the word disease
> used in connection with celiac.  Personally I feel I have a live
> long condition but I don't have a "disease" .  It isn't in many
> ways a disease in the typical sense of the word.

Personally, I couldn't agree more.  I tell people my son has 'Celiac' or
'Celiac Sprue', and I don't want my son (age 8) to think of himself as
having a disease.

In a light hearted way, when I talk about Celiac with others, I sometimes
say that THEY have 'Arsenic Disease' since their metabolism is such that
arsenic is toxic to them.  Gluten just happens to me far more common in
food than arsenic.

I realize that this is a stretch, but it tries to make the same point as
Norman did:

> People think if you have a disease, you are sick but I'm not sick
> (or a least not very often)

Bill Elkus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2