I use it at work, and I would say it's accessible. I'm not sure what 
accessibility glitches you're referring to, and I would say the 
interface is still clunky, but I don't have any problems reading 
messages or attachments. The one issue I have related to attachments is 
that I don't know how to access attachments attached to a message 
invite. I usually have to detach them first from the calendar view and 
then bring them up. This may not be true since I upgraded Outlook and 
JAWS recently, and I still need to see if this is a problem. I used to 
have problems reading the location of a meeting when I was creating the 
invite, but this has started working recently. There was also a problem 
where I couldn't edit my own signature template, but again, this started 
working recently.


On 5/5/19 10:48 PM, Ana G wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> My question is about Outlook. I haven't used it in a very long time. I 
> stopped because there were some big accessibility glitches and because 
> the UI was clunky. I don't remember the specifics now. I remember 
> having trouble reading messages and attachments, and I remember people 
> were still complaining about the same problems a few years after I'd 
> moved on to Thunderbird.
>
>
> How accessible is Outlook now? I'm thinking about using it for work 
> because some attachments that are being sent to me from Outlook and 
> Outlook Exchange are arriving as winmail.dat.
>
>
> Thanks for any wisdom.
>
>
> Ciao
>
>
>    VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
> Archived on the World Wide Web at
>    http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
>    Signoff: [log in to unmask]
>    Subscribe: [log in to unmask]

-- 
Christopher (CJ)
Chaltain at Gmail


    VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
    http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
    Signoff: [log in to unmask]
    Subscribe: [log in to unmask]