Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:05:49 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
My understanding was that Windows 1.0 and 2.0 were pretty much failures. It
wasn't until Windows 3.1 that Windows really took off. When most people
think of their first version of Windows in the late 80's, they're thinking
of Windows 3.1.
--
Christopher (AKA CJ)
Chaltain at Gmail
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List <VICUG-
> [log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Colin Howard
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 9:47 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [VICUG-L] 20 November, 1985.
>
> Greetings,
>
> On BBC Radio 4's News Briefing for today, I learnt, it was on this day in
1985,
> MicroSoft released it's very first version of the Windows operating
system,
> entitled Windows Version 1.0.
>
> I would be very interested to learn if, possibly, even after all this
time, anybody
> has a machine with Windows V1.0 running? I would be interested to lern of
> experiences of W V1.0, even as a sighted person.
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
>
> VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
> Archived on the World Wide Web at
> http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
> Signoff: [log in to unmask]
> Subscribe: [log in to unmask]
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
Signoff: [log in to unmask]
Subscribe: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|