 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:38:56 -0600 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
For me, it depends on the type of information being presented. If it's
tabular data, like what I would usually like to see in a spread sheet,
then I definitely prefer tables. If it's just straight text though, and
tables are just being used for formatting, then I just prefer getting at
the text.
On 11/17/2017 09:35 AM, Mike Pietruk wrote:
> This question prompts another question as I've seen this complaint on
> tables rather frequently.
> Why do screen reader users dislike tables? Personally, in most instances,
> especially with sites I use frequently that have tables of info, I find
> this to be a convenience rather than a nusiance.
> I have to guess, however, that there are some valid concerns that tables
> present which are not obvious to me.
> Appreciate some feedback on this.
>
>
--
Christopher (CJ)
Chaltain at Gmail
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
Signoff: [log in to unmask]
Subscribe: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|
