Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:04:29 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I believe that if you have a powerful enough computer, Version 5 can be
quite beneficial. However, users of Version 4 should just retrain the
Version 5 software rather than trying to upgrade their Version 4 voice
files. Apparently, the recognition that one gets with upgraded voice files
is poor.
Kathy
At 01:41 PM 8/30/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi Everyone,
>We have an opportunity to upgrade our Dragon Naturally Speaking
>Preferred from 4.01 to version 5. However, I recall that someone on
>this list reviewed 5 and recommended against upgrading to it from
>version 4 because (if I remember correctly) it had lost some
>intuitiveness and functionality. I'd be interested in hearing people's
>opinions of how version 5 compares with 4 now that it has been on the
>market for few months - does 5 have flaws? If so, are they serious?
>Thanks in advance,
>Athol Gow
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Kathy Cahill
MIT Adaptive Technology (ATIC) lab
77 Mass. Ave. 11-103
Cambridge MA 02139
(617) 253-5111
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|