BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Date:
Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:01:25 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
CEPT, and remote hams question
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<22C017E2D709425BBFE1E0215950D3B8@DavidPC>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
David Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
Hi:

The ARRL seems to feel  that in order to "control" an amateur station 
governed by the CEPt agreement a ham must be physically present in the 
CEPT's qth(country).If this interpretation is correct, this would severely 
reduce the # of stations which may be operated by U.S hams via the 
RCFORB(client) application.

Any other opinions on this?

Best regards,



David S. Pearson-wa4dsp 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2