But you responded to steve on the list, I really don't see the 
difference.  Following your logic, shouldn't you have written him off 
list?
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.


On Fri, 11 May 2018, Fred Olver wrote:

> Steve I understand that you made out like something someone says but is it r=
> eally necessary to rebuke them on the list? Can=E2=80=99t you send them a pr=
> ivate message rather than spanking them on the list thanks and 73 Fred and n=
> ine BSO
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On May 11, 2018, at 6:30 PM, Steve <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> =20
>> If I see anything, I'll forward it.
>> =20
>> But, I'm tired of you playing list-cop.
>> =20
>> Most lists are set up to reply to the list, so that anyone else who is=20
>> seeking an answer to the question can also benefit.
>> If you don't like all the traffic, as I suggested previously, set up a=20
>> message filter, or whatever.
>> =20
>> ----- Original Message -----=20
>> From: "Pierre Berube" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 10:50 PM
>> Subject: Back to you RE: Digipan accessibility question This is K9EYE
>> =20
>> =20
>>> Steve,
>>> I had to unsubscribe the blind ham groups.io
>>> Too much threading, and abusing the list to the point users are using it=20=
>
>>> as
>>> instant messaging.
>>> I told the owner that they should  have the option turned  on for people=20=
>
>>> to
>>> respond to the sender link at the bottom of the post.
>>> Steve, no one responded to my digipan question so I guess it was over=20
>>> their
>>> heads.
>>> Steve, if you could respond to me direct at my email address:
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>> Thanks again for trying to get help for me.
>>> Pierre Berube
>>> Lifetime Member of Handiham
>>> And Leader Dog Smokey=20
>
>