BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Date:
Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:51:30 -0600
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Pat Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Then it would be 1975, I would think.
Pat, K9JAUAt 04:40 PM 11/23/2015, you wrote:
>     Hi:
>
>I listened to a little of the contest on W0ZSW, and heard one of the
>contesters explain its  required info.  One thing that has me puzzled is the
>"check" requirement as I was first licensed as a Novice back in 1975/6-can't
>remember exact year as WA1ZHB, but that ticket lapsed, and I  had to start
>from "scratch" after move, and vision loss, and am now an Extra with the
>call-WA4DSP.
>
>If I were in that contest, and was asked  for my "check"(date of first
>licensing), what should be my reply?
>
>Sincerely,
>
>
>
>DSP
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Phil Scovell
>Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 5:29 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Good Contesting
>
>I heard at least three hams during the contest, stopping to explain to the
>person calling, how the exchanges work and the order they should be in and
>what each one meant.  Pretty good ham etiquette for such mean contesters,
>and bad ass ham contest stations, haha.
>
>Phil.
>K0NX
>
>
>---
>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>http://www.avast.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2