BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
Date:
Sun, 22 Nov 2015 15:09:47 -0700
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<128BA60DCFCD465BBA6F8040B3FB19C2@philscomputer>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Phil Scovell <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
I haven't seen anyone going to any of the high end ten tec rigs, such as the 
Eagle, posting about them on this list.  I read some reviews on E ham.net 
recently comparing it to the Kenwood TS590 and found it interesting.  The 
only thing I don't like about the new Icom and Kenwood rigs is the noisy 
full break in CW.  Ten tec has a corner on the market when it comes to CW 
rigs and full QSK.  Anybody used any of the new ten tec rigs?

Phil.
K0NX

ATOM RSS1 RSS2