BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Matthew Chao <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 22 Nov 2015 17:07:13 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
No, but wish they hadn't become so inaccessible.  Used to have a 
Tentec 525 Argosy with full qsk, and boy, that rig was quiet, no 
relays, no clicks, nothing.  Just broke right in and you could send 
instantly.  Even had a keyer that matched the radio.  Too bad it fell 
apart, right when I got my general ticket, hi.--Matt, N1IBB.

At 05:09 PM 11/22/2015, Phil Scovell wrote:
>I haven't seen anyone going to any of the high end ten tec rigs, such as the
>Eagle, posting about them on this list.  I read some reviews on E ham.net
>recently comparing it to the Kenwood TS590 and found it interesting.  The
>only thing I don't like about the new Icom and Kenwood rigs is the noisy
>full break in CW.  Ten tec has a corner on the market when it comes to CW
>rigs and full QSK.  Anybody used any of the new ten tec rigs?
>
>Phil.
>K0NX

ATOM RSS1 RSS2