Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:16:45 +1300 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi!
I guess there are similarities, but Echolink is pretty limited in what
remote control you have.
73,
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Angelo Sonnesso
Sent: Wednesday, 6 January 2016 3:22 a.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Remote ham radio legalities :
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't Echo Link similar.=20
73 N2DYN Angelo
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators =
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Colin McDonald
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:48 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Remote ham radio legalities :
it's perfectly legal to operate remote in the US and Canada.
His cagyness likely stemmed from some peoples desire to be secretive or =
not to give too much information away...most hams aren't like this, and will
overwhelm you with all the smallest details lol, but others feel they = have
to hold information back for privacy or whatever...also the remote he = was
using may not have been his and the remote station operator/controller = may
have asked that he not give away the details of the station or the = system
being used.
Beyond that, as long as he was identifying himself with a legitimate = call
sign everything is legal.
The fact that he said openly that he was operating remote says allot, = but
perhaps it's a brand new remote system of hardware or software that = isn't
yet available to the public and he was asked to keep it underwraps for = the
moment.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Ryan
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2016 1:34 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Remote ham radio legalities :
Hi all:
1st up let me wish all of you a belated but better than never happy and
healthy new year.
The other night I was working W2RE on 75M and he told me he was oping =
remote from NY. I asked him if he was using either remote hams or the remote
= ham radio service and his response seemed strange. He told me he couldn't
= say so this makes me wonder if working DX from a remote station in the
states = is actually legal?
Hed also told me that he'd purchased 63 achers in Main and he was going = to
put up some rotating towers. He is hoping to have this station = operational
late 2016. He=C2 had a significant chunk=C2 of the DX window hogged = yet
he couldn't tell me which remote service he was running.
73:
Mike DE VO1AX
.
Sent from BlueMail=20
|
|
|