Hi Scott!
I can ask on tour net tonight. Are you interested in police, fire or which
service in particular?
If one of the guys locally don't know, there's a good chance Ivan will.
73,
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Scott Gillen ZL1CHM
Sent: Sunday, 29 November 2015 12:07 p.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: P-25 audio?
I'd be interested to know if there's a way to find out what system they use
i= n Auckland.=20
Scott
N0HOK / ZL1CHM
Auckland New Zealand's
Sent from my iPhone
On 29/11/2015, at 7:46 AM, John Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Newer P25 sounds a lot better than old but still the P25 audio
> doesn=E2=80=
=99t even=20
> compare with NXDN or DMR which I don't care what anyone says they
> still=20=
> sound digital to me but nowhere near as bad as DStar and P25. Yaesu's
> fusi=
on=20
> sounds respectable as well but it's based off the newer P25 version
>=20
> -----Original Message-----=20
> From: Jim Gammon
> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 11:02 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: P-25 audio?
>=20
> Yah Pat, we have P-25 here too and sometimes it's just a bunch of
>garble, you know, like Greta Garble, smile. But, it is what it is,
>whatever that means so we must live with it and hope they don't just
>all go encrypted! Jim WA6EKS
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pat Byrne <[log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date sent: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 09:33:29 -0600
> Subject: Re: New Kenwood? what new Kenwood?
>=20
> And what concerns me Jim is which digital protocole will survive?
>Yaesu has theirs and of course, Icom has Dstar, and perhaps that's
>not all the entries. And our local police are a part of a Motorola,
>state-wide P25 system and I struggle to hear what is being said.
>These old ears don't hear all that well any more, even with
>overpriced hearing aids!
> Pat, K9JAUAt 02:12 AM 11/28/2015, you wrote:
> Oh, well I for one am not yet interested in digital radio. I wonder
>if it will develop into a flap like when, in the fifties, people were
>changing from AM to SSB? Yes I know digital offers infinitely more
>possibilities than that transition, but it is still worth
>investigating before jumping into it particularly because of the
>accessibility questions that so often plague blind folks these days.
>73, Jim WA6EKS
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dustin Thompson <[log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date sent: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 02:04:07 -0600
> Subject: Re: New Kenwood? what new Kenwood?
>=20
> The DStar trip bander, or that's was the word at a ham convention and
>the DS=3D tar mailing list...=3D20
>=20
> 73 Dustin KF5VXR
>=20
>=20
> On Nov 28, 2015, at 1:56 AM, Jim Gammon <[log in to unmask]
> wrote:
> =3D20
> What=3D3D20new=3D3D20Kenwood?=3D3D20Jim=3D3D20WA6EKS
> =3D20
> -----=3D3D20Original=3D3D20Message=3D3D20-----
> From:=3D3D20Dustin=3D3D20Thompson=3D3D20<[log in to unmask]
> To:[log in to unmask]
>=20
>
>Date=3D3D20sent:=3D3D20Sat,=3D3D2028=3D3D20Nov=3D3D202015=3D3D2000:55:5
>4=3D=
3D20
> -0600
>=20
>
>Subject:=3D3D20Now=3D3D20that=3D3D20Thanksgiving=3D3D20has=3D3D20come=3
>D3D=
20a
> nd=3D3D20go=3D
> ne=3D3DE2=3D3D80=3D3DA6
> =3D20
>=20
>
>Now=3D3D20that=3D3D20Thanksgiving=3D3D20has=3D3D20come=3D3D20and=3D3D20
>gon=
e,=3D
> 3D20has=3D3D=3D
> 20anyone=3D3D20Heard=3D3D
> =3D3D20
> anything=3D3D20about=3D3D20the=3D3D3D
> =3D3D20New=3D3D20Kenwood=3D3D20yet???????
> =3D20
> 73=3D3D20Dustin=3D3D20KF5VXR=20
|
