BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Scott Gillen ZL1CHM <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:06:46 +1300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
I'd be interested to know if there's a way to find out what system they use in Auckland. 

Scott
N0HOK / ZL1CHM
Auckland New Zealand's

Sent from my iPhone

On 29/11/2015, at 7:46 AM, John Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Newer P25 sounds a lot better than old but still the P25 audio doesn’t even 
> compare with NXDN or DMR which I don't care what anyone says they still 
> sound digital to me but nowhere near as bad as DStar and P25. Yaesu's fusion 
> sounds respectable as well but it's based off the newer P25 version
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Jim Gammon
> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 11:02 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: P-25 audio?
> 
> Yah Pat, we have P-25 here too and sometimes it's just a bunch of
> garble, you know, like Greta Garble, smile.  But, it is what it
> is, whatever that means so we must live with it and hope they
> don't just all go encrypted! Jim WA6EKS
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pat Byrne <[log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date sent: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 09:33:29 -0600
> Subject: Re: New Kenwood? what new Kenwood?
> 
> And what concerns me Jim is which digital protocole will
> survive?  Yaesu has theirs and of course, Icom has Dstar, and
> perhaps
> that's not all the entries.  And our local police are a part of a
> Motorola, state-wide P25 system and I struggle to hear what is
> being
> said.  These old ears don't hear all that well any more, even
> with
> overpriced hearing aids!
> Pat, K9JAUAt 02:12 AM 11/28/2015, you wrote:
> Oh, well I for one am not yet interested in digital radio.  I
> wonder if it will develop into a flap like when, in the fifties,
> people were changing from AM to SSB? Yes I know digital offers
> infinitely more possibilities than that transition,  but it is
> still worth investigating before jumping into it particularly
> because of the accessibility questions that so often plague blind
> folks these days.  73, Jim WA6EKS
> 
>  ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dustin Thompson <[log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date sent: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 02:04:07 -0600
> Subject: Re: New Kenwood? what new Kenwood?
> 
> The DStar trip bander, or that's was the word at a ham convention
> and the DS=
> tar mailing list...=20
> 
> 73 Dustin KF5VXR
> 
> 
>  On Nov 28, 2015, at 1:56 AM, Jim Gammon <[log in to unmask]
> wrote:
> =20
>  What=3D20new=3D20Kenwood?=3D20Jim=3D20WA6EKS
> =20
>  -----=3D20Original=3D20Message=3D20-----
>  From:=3D20Dustin=3D20Thompson=3D20<[log in to unmask]
>  To:[log in to unmask]
> 
> Date=3D20sent:=3D20Sat,=3D2028=3D20Nov=3D202015=3D2000:55:54=3D20
> -0600
> 
> Subject:=3D20Now=3D20that=3D20Thanksgiving=3D20has=3D20come=3D20a
> nd=3D20go=
> ne=3DE2=3D80=3DA6
> =20
> 
> Now=3D20that=3D20Thanksgiving=3D20has=3D20come=3D20and=3D20gone,=
> 3D20has=3D=
> 20anyone=3D20Heard=3D
>  =3D20
>  anything=3D20about=3D20the=3D3D
>  =3D20New=3D20Kenwood=3D20yet???????
> =20
>  73=3D20Dustin=3D20KF5VXR 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2