BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 28 Nov 2015 13:46:23 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (79 lines)
Newer P25 sounds a lot better than old but still the P25 audio doesn’t even 
compare with NXDN or DMR which I don't care what anyone says they still 
sound digital to me but nowhere near as bad as DStar and P25. Yaesu's fusion 
sounds respectable as well but it's based off the newer P25 version

-----Original Message----- 
From: Jim Gammon
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 11:02 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: P-25 audio?

Yah Pat, we have P-25 here too and sometimes it's just a bunch of
garble, you know, like Greta Garble, smile.  But, it is what it
is, whatever that means so we must live with it and hope they
don't just all go encrypted! Jim WA6EKS

----- Original Message -----
From: Pat Byrne <[log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Date sent: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 09:33:29 -0600
Subject: Re: New Kenwood? what new Kenwood?

And what concerns me Jim is which digital protocole will
survive?  Yaesu has theirs and of course, Icom has Dstar, and
perhaps
that's not all the entries.  And our local police are a part of a
Motorola, state-wide P25 system and I struggle to hear what is
being
said.  These old ears don't hear all that well any more, even
with
overpriced hearing aids!
Pat, K9JAUAt 02:12 AM 11/28/2015, you wrote:
Oh, well I for one am not yet interested in digital radio.  I
wonder if it will develop into a flap like when, in the fifties,
people were changing from AM to SSB? Yes I know digital offers
infinitely more possibilities than that transition,  but it is
still worth investigating before jumping into it particularly
because of the accessibility questions that so often plague blind
folks these days.  73, Jim WA6EKS

  ----- Original Message -----
From: Dustin Thompson <[log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Date sent: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 02:04:07 -0600
Subject: Re: New Kenwood? what new Kenwood?

The DStar trip bander, or that's was the word at a ham convention
and the DS=
tar mailing list...=20

73 Dustin KF5VXR


  On Nov 28, 2015, at 1:56 AM, Jim Gammon <[log in to unmask]
wrote:
=20
  What=3D20new=3D20Kenwood?=3D20Jim=3D20WA6EKS
=20
  -----=3D20Original=3D20Message=3D20-----
  From:=3D20Dustin=3D20Thompson=3D20<[log in to unmask]
  To:[log in to unmask]

Date=3D20sent:=3D20Sat,=3D2028=3D20Nov=3D202015=3D2000:55:54=3D20
-0600

Subject:=3D20Now=3D20that=3D20Thanksgiving=3D20has=3D20come=3D20a
nd=3D20go=
ne=3DE2=3D80=3DA6
=20

Now=3D20that=3D20Thanksgiving=3D20has=3D20come=3D20and=3D20gone,=
3D20has=3D=
20anyone=3D20Heard=3D
  =3D20
  anything=3D20about=3D20the=3D3D
  =3D20New=3D20Kenwood=3D20yet???????
=20
  73=3D20Dustin=3D20KF5VXR 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2