BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Accessible Transceivers
From:
Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:35:55 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines) 
and if you use Jim's JJ radio ts2000 computer program, it gives you all the 
accessibility of the ts590 and more.




73
Colin, V A6BKX
-----Original Message----- 
From: Steve
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 1:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Accessible Transceivers

If it is between the 2000 and the 480, then there's really no contest in =
my opinion. =20

The 2000 gives you more features; 6, 2 and 470CM coverage, with about =
the same level of accessibility from the voice-chip. =20

The 480 has the detachable head, if that matters in a confined space or =
if you want to operate mobile, that would give you more room in the =
driver's compartment.

Steve
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Dustin Thompson=20
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 12:34 AM
Subject: Re: Accessible Transceivers


I'm thinking about just saving up and getting either the 2000 or   start =
wit=3D
h the 480, and maybe getting the 2000 or maybe even the =
590=3DE2=3D80=3DA6 later o=3D
n down the road=3DE2=3D80=3DA6

Sent from iPhone=3D20

> On Jul 20, 2015, at 11:10 PM, howard kaufman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>=3D20
> Well that would give different answers for every question.
> You could argue the basic kx-3 for cost, but not if you need 100 =
watts, a
> wider range tuner, 2 meters and 440 MHZ and speech.  Each options adds =
to
> the purchase price.  The k-3 is similar, but the 100 watt amplifier =
fits i=3D
n
> the same case as the radio, which makes it less portable.  The k-3 =
does it=3D
s
> functions using more hardware, while the k-3 does it all with =
software.
> So you see, the answer gets complicated.  Its rather like buying a =
house,
> what is essential, and what can you compromise on?
> There is no best, the question is what is the best for you?
>=3D20
>=3D20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators =
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]=3D

> On Behalf Of Dustin Thompson
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 9:44 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Accessible Transceivers
>=3D20
>>> All of the above=3D3DE2=3D3D80=3D3DA6

ATOM RSS1 RSS2