Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:36:51 -0700 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would say a faulty assumption. You're talking above sea level which
really doesn't mean that much. If you are doint mountain top to
mountain top, perhaps. Mostly what matters is your heighth above
average terane as we use to call it in commercial radio systems. If you
tell me your beam is at 5280 or whatever, I'm thinking wow, what a
tower. Everybody just says how tall their antenna is. My new tower,
when erected will be a 90 foot free standing tower with a mosley clasic
33 at the top 90 feet.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, David Pearson wrote:
> Hi:
>
> If a person's QTH is in an elevated area(Denver, for example), which is
> nicknamed the "mile-high city", and they tell you that their hex beam is
> mounted at a height of 50 feet, it seems to me that this figure should be
> added to the QTH's elevation to have a more accurate height Is this valid,
> or is this a faulty assumption ?
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
>
>
> David S. Pearson-wa4dsp.
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
|
|
|