BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3111\))
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Sun, 22 Nov 2015 16:47:51 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Buddy Brannan <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
I wouldn't give Ten-Tec a dime. They show about as much interest in accessibility as Yaesu does, lately at least. Besides, they've thrown in their lot with Alpha, and it sounds like Alpha might be in trouble. 

Elecraft all the way! 

--
Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
Phone: 814-860-3194 
Mobile: 814-431-0962
Email: [log in to unmask]




> On Nov 22, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Phil Scovell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> I haven't seen anyone going to any of the high end ten tec rigs, such as the 
> Eagle, posting about them on this list.  I read some reviews on E ham.net 
> recently comparing it to the Kenwood TS590 and found it interesting.  The 
> only thing I don't like about the new Icom and Kenwood rigs is the noisy 
> full break in CW.  Ten tec has a corner on the market when it comes to CW 
> rigs and full QSK.  Anybody used any of the new ten tec rigs?
> 
> Phil.
> K0NX

ATOM RSS1 RSS2