BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Scott Gillen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 May 2015 09:43:17 +1200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
What is a good place to search for available calls?

Scott

Sent from my iPhone

On 24/05/2015, at 3:42 AM, Fred Adams <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Sorry but I deleted it already and my deleted folder has been cleaned out
> to.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Tom Behler
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 11:33 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated
> 
> Fred:
> 
> I'm not finding the NPRM in your e-mail.
> 
> I'm obviously missing something.
> 
> Would like to forward it onto others if you have it.
> 
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Fred Adams
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 7:26 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: FW: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated
> 
> Subject: RE: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated (TCW)
> 
> This is very interesting and not totally clear. There are two distinct fees
> regarding Vanity Call Signs; the initial application fee and the renewal
> fee. This NPRM clearly states that the application fees are to be
> eliminated but it is not clear if the renewal fees are also to be
> eliminated. There is no redundancy in fee collections for renewals as there
> is for multiple applications for the same call sign. Time will tell.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2